<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>eCommons Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1813/11728" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/11728</id>
  <updated>2013-05-18T06:55:54Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-18T06:55:54Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION FOR PROJECT SCHEDULING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/1813/11724" />
    <author>
      <name>Mahmoudoff, Ali</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/11724</id>
    <updated>2009-01-15T02:05:50Z</updated>
    <published>2006-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION FOR PROJECT SCHEDULING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY
Authors: Mahmoudoff, Ali
Abstract: Project planning and scheduling when there are both resource constraints and&#xD;
uncertainty in task durations is an important and complex problem. There is a long&#xD;
history of work on deterministic resource-constrained project scheduling problems,&#xD;
but efforts directed at stochastic versions of that problem are fewer and more recent.&#xD;
Incorporating the ability to reallocate resources among tasks to change the&#xD;
characteristics of their duration probability distributions adds another important&#xD;
dimension to the problem, and enables integration of project planning and scheduling.&#xD;
Among the small number of previous works on this subject, there are two very&#xD;
different perspectives. Golenko-Ginzburg and Gonik (1997, 1998) have created a&#xD;
simulation-based approach that ?operates? the project through time and attempts to&#xD;
optimize locally regarding decisions on starting specific tasks at specific times.&#xD;
Turnquist and Nozick (2004) have formulated a nonlinear optimization model to plan&#xD;
resource allocations and schedule decisions a priori. This has the advantage of taking&#xD;
a global perspective on the project in making resource allocation decisions, but it is&#xD;
not adaptive to the experience with earlier tasks when making later decisions in the&#xD;
same way that the simulation approach is. Although the solution to their model&#xD;
produces a ?baseline schedule? (i.e., times when tasks are planned to start), the&#xD;
formulation puts much greater emphasis on resource allocation decisions.&#xD;
The paper by Turnquist and Nozick (2004) describes the problem formulation&#xD;
as a nonlinear optimization. For small problem instances (up to about 30 tasks), good&#xD;
solutions can be found using standard nonlinear programming packages(e.g., NPSOL).&#xD;
However, for larger problems, the standard packages often fail to find any solution in&#xD;
a reasonable amount of computational time. One major contribution of this&#xD;
dissertation is the development of a solution method that can solve larger problem&#xD;
instances efficiently and reliably. In this dissertation, we recommend using the&#xD;
partially augmented Lagrangian (PAL) method to solve the suggested nonlinear&#xD;
optimization. The test problems considered here include projects with up to 90 tasks,&#xD;
and solutions to the 90-task problems take about 2 minutes on a desktop PC.&#xD;
A second contribution of this dissertation is exploration of insights that can be&#xD;
gained through systematic variation of the basic parameters of the model formulation&#xD;
on a given problem. These insights have both computational and managerial&#xD;
implications for practical application of the model.</summary>
    <dc:date>2006-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

