<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>eCommons Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/12569</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T04:06:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Family Man in the Other America: New Opportunities, Motivations, and Supports for Paternal Caregiving</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15125</link>
      <description>Title: Family Man in the Other America: New Opportunities, Motivations, and Supports for Paternal Caregiving
Authors: Waller, Maureen
Abstract: This analysis draws on longitudinal, qualitative interviews&#xD;
with disadvantaged mothers and fathers who participated&#xD;
in the Fragile Families Study (a U.S. birth&#xD;
cohort study) to examine how issues related to men’s&#xD;
employment, social support, skills, and motivation facilitated&#xD;
their care of young children in different relationship&#xD;
contexts. Interviews with parents indicate that while&#xD;
some motivated and skilled men actively chose to become&#xD;
caregivers with the support of mothers, others developed&#xD;
new motivations, skills, and parenting supports in response&#xD;
to situations in which they were out of work or the&#xD;
mother was experiencing challenges. These findings suggest&#xD;
that disadvantaged men who assume caregiving&#xD;
responsibilities take different paths to involvement in the&#xD;
early years after their child’s birth. Policies that overlook&#xD;
paternal caregivers may not only miss the opportunity to&#xD;
support relationships that benefit at-risk children but also&#xD;
unintentionally undermine this involvement.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15125</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice: Where Do We Go From Here?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15124</link>
      <description>Title: Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice: Where Do We Go From Here?
Authors: Trochim, William
Abstract: The author develops the basic idea of evaluation policy, describes a practical&#xD;
model for development and revision of evaluation policies (including a taxonomy,&#xD;
structure, and set of principles), and suggests critical challenges and opportunities&#xD;
for the future of evaluation policy. An evaluation policy is any rule or&#xD;
principle that a group or organization uses to guide its decisions and actions&#xD;
when doing evaluation. Every entity that engages in evaluation, including government&#xD;
agencies, private businesses, and nonprofit organizations, has evaluation&#xD;
policies. Sometimes they are explicit and written; more often they are&#xD;
implicit and ad hoc principles or norms that have simply evolved over time.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15124</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Developing a conceptual framework for an evaluation system for the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15123</link>
      <description>Title: Developing a conceptual framework for an evaluation system for the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks
Authors: Trochim, William
Abstract: Globally, health research organizations are called upon to re-examine their policies and practices&#xD;
to more efficiently and effectively address current scientific and social needs, as well as increasing&#xD;
public demands for accountability.&#xD;
Through a case study approach, the authors examine an effort undertaken by the National Institute&#xD;
of Allergy &amp; Infectious Diseases (part of the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health &amp;&#xD;
Human Services, United States Government) to develop an evaluation system for its recently&#xD;
restructured HIV/AIDS clinical trials program. The challenges in designing, operationalizing, and&#xD;
managing global clinical trials programs are considered in the context of large scale scientific&#xD;
research initiatives.&#xD;
Through a process of extensive stakeholder input, a framework of success factors was developed&#xD;
that enables both a prospective view of the elements that must be addressed in an evaluation of&#xD;
this research and a current state assessment of the extent to which the goals of the restructuring&#xD;
are understood by stakeholders across the DAIDS clinical research networks.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15123</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15122</link>
      <description>Title: Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice
Authors: Trochim, William
Abstract: Evaluation policy is of considerable importance, especially in relation to the limited&#xD;
amount of attention it receives as a general topic in the mainstream evaluation&#xD;
literature. Evaluation policies matter for several reasons, among them that&#xD;
they can profoundly affect evaluation practice, they underlie many recent and&#xD;
current controversies about evaluation, and they may be a lever for change that&#xD;
can have far-reaching effects for practice. This chapter gives an overview of several&#xD;
issues regarding evaluation policy, including defining it, identifying possible&#xD;
facets of evaluation policy, describing how it is established, and outlining the&#xD;
potentially greater role for evaluators in shaping the evaluation policies that&#xD;
influence evaluation practice.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15122</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15121</link>
      <description>Title: Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice
Authors: Trochim, William
Abstract: Three issues for evaluation policy and practice are described: evaluation policy&#xD;
dimensions, evaluation policy instruments, and the political and economic environment&#xD;
for evaluation policy. Selected future directions are outlined, including&#xD;
the need to describe the evaluation policy landscape, further articulate an evaluation&#xD;
policy taxonomy, and develop and implement tactics for influencing&#xD;
evaluation policy, with particular attention to the role of professional associations.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15121</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Role of Evaluation in Research-Practice Integration: Working Toward the "Golden Spike</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15120</link>
      <description>Title: The Role of Evaluation in Research-Practice Integration: Working Toward the "Golden Spike
Authors: Trochim, William
Abstract: Program evaluation and planning is at the heart of efforts to integrate the domains of practice and&#xD;
research. Traditionally, research and practice have operated in independent spheres with&#xD;
practitioners focused on the implementation of programs that affect individual behavior and&#xD;
researchers focused on the development and testing of theory. Evidence-based practice (EBP),&#xD;
practice-based evidence, and translational research have attempted to unite these worlds, and&#xD;
although significant advances have been made, there is a continued need to find mechanisms that&#xD;
enable a seamless connection between knowledge generation and application. We propose a&#xD;
method that builds on the traditions of theory-driven evaluation, logic modeling, and systems science&#xD;
and uses evaluation and program planning as the bridging mechanism between research and practice.&#xD;
Included in this approach are methods that aid in the explicit expression of implicit theories, management&#xD;
of evaluation resources, and linkage of program theory and evaluation measures to a&#xD;
research evidence base.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15120</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Liability: Law, Theory, and Economic Consequences</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15119</link>
      <description>Title: First-Party Insurance Bad Faith Liability: Law, Theory, and Economic Consequences
Authors: Tennyson, Sharon</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15119</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Relationship between Auto Insurance Rate Regulation and Insured Loss Costs: An Empirical Analysis</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15118</link>
      <description>Title: The Relationship between Auto Insurance Rate Regulation and Insured Loss Costs: An Empirical Analysis
Authors: Tennyson, Sharon
Abstract: This study points out a potential unintended effect of efforts to enhance&#xD;
affordability of insurance prices by regulating rates: It may ultimately lead to&#xD;
higher insurance costs. This is because rate regulation that suppresses insurance&#xD;
prices below competitive levels, or provides significant premium subsidies for&#xD;
some consumers, creates a variety of incentive distortions in the market. The&#xD;
article summarizes the theoretical arguments for this effect and provides empirical&#xD;
evidence of cost-increasing effects of rate regulation. The analysis uses state-level&#xD;
data on automobile insurance costs and claims rates for the period 1990 through&#xD;
1998, and employs empirical methods that control for the possible reverse&#xD;
causation of high insurance costs leading to consumer demand for rate regulation.&#xD;
We find that bodily injury and property damage liability loss costs are higher in&#xD;
rate-regulated states, and that the bodily injury to property damage liability claims&#xD;
ratio is higher in regulated states.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15118</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Emergence and Potential Consequences of First Party Insurance Bad Faith Liability</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15117</link>
      <description>Title: The Emergence and Potential Consequences of First Party Insurance Bad Faith Liability
Authors: Tennyson, Sharon
Abstract: This article discusses the approaches to first-party insurance bad-faith law that&#xD;
have been taken by the states, using legal and economic reasoning to illuminate&#xD;
the potential benefits and costs of different approaches. Theory suggests that&#xD;
allowing policyholders to recover damages over and above the value of the&#xD;
insurance benefit owed will provide insurers with added incentives to engage in&#xD;
fair claims settlement. However, excessive or uncertain liability for insurance bad&#xD;
faith might create incentives for policyholders to file questionable claims and&#xD;
disincentives for insurers to investigate claims for fraud. The article analyzes a&#xD;
large dataset of first-party automobile insurance claims to investigate whether these adverse effects appear to have empirical relevance. The data show that claim&#xD;
characteristics in states that permit tort-based bad faith differ from those in other&#xD;
states. The findings are consistent with the idea that permitting tort-based firstparty&#xD;
insurance bad-faith settlements might reduce insurer incentives to challenge&#xD;
disputable claims.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15117</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do State Cost Control Policies Reduce Medicaid Prescription Drug Spending?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15116</link>
      <description>Title: Do State Cost Control Policies Reduce Medicaid Prescription Drug Spending?
Authors: Tennyson, Sharon
Abstract: We present the first systematic analysis of state policies limiting prescription&#xD;
drug access under Medicaid during 1990–2004, documenting their impact&#xD;
on states’Medicaid prescription spending growth.We see substantial variation&#xD;
in the number and type of policies used by states, but a clear upward trend in restrictions&#xD;
over time. Analysis of state level annual spending growth shows that&#xD;
these restrictions have in general helped contain Medicaid prescription drug&#xD;
costs and that some approaches, such as the use of preferred drug lists (PDLs)&#xD;
and tiered copayment systems, may have been more effective than others.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1813/15116</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

