Circumstantial and Temporal Dependence in Counterfactual Modals
Loading...
No Access Until
Permanent Link(s)
Other Titles
Author(s)
Abstract
“Counterfactual” readings of might/could have were previously analyzed using metaphysical modal bases. This paper presents examples and scenarios where the assumptions of such a branching-time semantics are not met, because there are facts at the base world that exclude the complement of the modal becoming true. Additional arguments show that counterfactual readings are context-dependent. These data motivate a semantics using a circumstantial (or factual) modal base, which refers to context-dependent facts about a world and time. The analysis is formulated in a version of the premise semantics for modality.
Journal / Series
Volume & Issue
Description
Final pre-publication version of a paper to appear in Natural Language Semantics.
Sponsorship
Date Issued
2012-02-19
Publisher
Keywords
metaphysical modality; circumstantial modality; premise semantics; interactions between tense and modality; branching time; natural language semantics
Location
Effective Date
Expiration Date
Sector
Employer
Union
Union Local
NAICS
Number of Workers
Committee Chair
Committee Co-Chair
Committee Member
Degree Discipline
Degree Name
Degree Level
Related Version
Earlier version circulated on Semantics Archive, http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/2NhNGNlZ/, 15-Jun-2008.
Related DOI
Related To
Related Part
Based on Related Item
Has Other Format(s)
Part of Related Item
Related To
Related Publication(s)
Link(s) to Related Publication(s)
References
Link(s) to Reference(s)
Previously Published As
Government Document
ISBN
ISMN
ISSN
Other Identifiers
Rights
Rights URI
Types
article