Skip to main content


eCommons@Cornell

eCommons@Cornell >
College of Engineering >
Computer Science >
Computer Science Technical Reports >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/6404
Title: A Comparison of Two Methods for Boolean Query Relevance Feedback
Authors: Salton, Gerard
Fox, Edward A.
Voorhees, Ellen M.
Keywords: computer science
technical report
Issue Date: Jul-1983
Publisher: Cornell University
Citation: http://techreports.library.cornell.edu:8081/Dienst/UI/1.0/Display/cul.cs/TR83-564
Abstract: The relevance feedback process uses information derived from an initially retrieved set of documents to improve subsequent search formulations and retrieval output. In a Boolean query environment this implies that new query terms must be identified and Boolean operators must be chosen automatically to connect the various query terms. In this study, two recently proposed automatic methods for relevance feedback of Boolean queries are evaluated and conclusions are drawn concerning the use of effective feedback methods in a Boolean query environment.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1813/6404
Appears in Collections:Computer Science Technical Reports

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
83-564.pdf1.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
83-564.ps464.98 kBPostscriptView/Open

Refworks Export

Items in eCommons are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

© 2014 Cornell University Library Contact Us