eCommons

 

A Case for Language-Based Protection

Other Titles

Abstract

The use of language mechanisms to enforce protection boundaries around software modules has become increasingly attractive. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of language-based protection over more traditional protection mechanisms, such as standard virtual memory protection hardware, software fault isolation, and capability systems. Arguably, state-of-the-art language-based protection is more flexible and as safe as these other mechanisms. Two major remaining issues are the performance of language-based protection, and the management of resources. Regarding the latter, techniques to build an operating system kernel capable of managing resources and revoking rights are presented.

Journal / Series

Volume & Issue

Description

Sponsorship

Date Issued

1998-03

Publisher

Cornell University

Keywords

computer science; technical report

Location

Effective Date

Expiration Date

Sector

Employer

Union

Union Local

NAICS

Number of Workers

Committee Chair

Committee Co-Chair

Committee Member

Degree Discipline

Degree Name

Degree Level

Related Version

Related DOI

Related To

Related Part

Based on Related Item

Has Other Format(s)

Part of Related Item

Related To

Related Publication(s)

Link(s) to Related Publication(s)

References

Link(s) to Reference(s)

Previously Published As

http://techreports.library.cornell.edu:8081/Dienst/UI/1.0/Display/cul.cs/TR98-1670

Government Document

ISBN

ISMN

ISSN

Other Identifiers

Rights

Rights URI

Types

technical report

Accessibility Feature

Accessibility Hazard

Accessibility Summary

Link(s) to Catalog Record