Skip to main content


eCommons@Cornell >
College of Arts and Sciences >
Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies >
Nimat Hafez Barazangi Scholarly Works >
Action Research Program Development and Evaluation >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Evaluation Model for an Undergraduate Action Research Program
Authors: Barazangi, Nimat Hafez
Greenwood, Davydd J.
Burns, Melissa Grace
Finnie, Jamecia Lynn
Keywords: Evaluation model of action research
Undergraduate action research
Reflective analysis
Self-generated data
Issue Date: 2004
Publisher: The University of Victoria
Citation: Conference Proceedings: Learning and the World We Want (152-59). (The University of Victoria, November 20-24, 2003)
Abstract: In this paper, we will articulate how the model of "evaluation being central to learning, teaching, and living Action Research (AR)" has evolved. This model was developed as part of the Bartels Undergraduate Fellows Program at Cornell University who are collaborating with surrounding communities. The model is centered on the Fellows' participation in the reflective analysis of their self-generated data. The goal is to learn about AR by actually using its tools to understand their own learning process and how their acquired learning behaviors are, to a certain extent, stand in the way of their being able to help their community partners solve issues of joint interest. These community partners are interested in finding sustainable and fair solutions to issues of North American Indian women's health, hazing, stereotyping, homelessness, youth conflicts and empowerment, incarceration, migrant farm workers, and community development that have been reinforced by the passive learning/teaching/research approach. This reflective view is what we hope will 'click' among the fellows when they examine their own self-evaluation data. From this, we hope to learn how: (1) the undergraduate seminar instructional process is imparting the epistemology and methodology of Participatory Action Research with the participating Fellows, and what have been limiting or facilitating the process, and (2) how the university organizational structure is providing support or limitation to the faculty and staff who mentor the participating Fellows in service learning. In other words, we hope to understand how best to realize AR in a participatory learning environment that is based in a participatory community development.
Description: Copyright 2004, The University of Victoria. See also:
Appears in Collections:Action Research Program Development and Evaluation

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
NHB_EvalModel_2004.pdf320.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Refworks Export

Items in eCommons are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


© 2014 Cornell University Library Contact Us